Woody’s View

Dubuque, Iowa the little dumping spot for Chicago, Milwaukee, Detroit, Rockford and all places the liberal left have too full. The current administration in our once fair city have lost control of the destiny the taxpayers had once dreamed of. It’s not diversity that will bring Dubuque’s citizens to their knees, but crime is the way Dubuque will die. An over load of welfare receiving section 8 recipients will eventually may Dubuque scream uncle. This group of criminals will be black, white, hispanic and come and take what we have taken for granted these many years, our safety and security. People travelling in and around Dubuque will find a CCW permit as necessary as the car keys they use daily. The thought of a child out playing near home will and should be watched more intently then ever. The trip to school will leave parents to ponder the safety of their children. Somewhere along the line our elected leaders have forgotten who pays their wages and covers the expenses of the city.

Our leaders

Presidential Leadership should be a major concern to voters but I see nothing but Democratic victories in the coming election unless voters wake up.
                                                                                  Joe
P.S. 43% of Americans pay no income tax. Not Fair!!

Hmmmmmm!!!
Just a messenger. It’s up you to decide how you feel
about it.
Not interested in discussing the content of this email.
WHO’S NEW IN THE WHITE  HOUSE?
Look who’s new in the white house!
Arif Alikhan
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityMohammed Elibiary
Homeland Security AdviserRashad Hussain
Special Envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference(OIC)  Salam al-Marayati
Obama Adviser and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council and is its current executive director 

Imam Mohamed Magid-
Obama’s Sharia Czar from the Islamic Society of North America 

Eboo Patel-
Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships

This is flat-out scary!!!
  

The foxes are now officially living in the hen house…

Now ask me why I am very concerned!!!

Do you feel OK with this???

How can this happen, and when will we wake up???

Doesn’t this make you feel safe!?
We are quiet while our Country is being drastically changed!!!If you’re not CONCERNED, DELETE this.
Go to bed tonight…sleep well!

Otherwise, pass it on get the word out!  We’ve got to have some relief starting with the 2014 Elections!

What does this mean?

Dubuque City Council

  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 54
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Something rotten in Dubuque?
« on: March 01, 2014, 04:39:13 PM »
 
This appears as an action item for this Monday’s city council meeting, March 3, 2014.Is this an affront to the Right to Free Assembly? Could it affect even an gathering on your own private property?And why is this not being reported by the Telegraph Herald?Read The AgendaCode of Ordinances Amendment – Title 10 Waiver Policy for Special Events
City Manager recommending approval of an ordinance establishing a Special Event Waiver process and approval of the recommended Special Event Waiver Policy.

ORDINANCE Amending City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances Title 10 Public Ways and Property, Chapter 4 Parades and Assemblies by adding separate sections for groups of 24 or less people and groups of 25 or more, clarifying that a Hold Harmless Agreement is necessary for groups of over 25 people, distinguishing between events that occur on City property, public right-of-way, or private property, clarifying when a permit is necessary for events on private property, and adding a provision which allows the City Manager to waive certain requirements per an adopted Policy; and amending Title 10 Public Ways and Property by adding a new Chapter 8, Valet Drop Off Parking; Permit Requirements which moves the Valet Parking Regulations to a different location within Title 10

Suggested Disposition: Receive and File; Motion B; Motion A
Special Event Permit Waiver Policy-MVM Memo, Staff Memo, Ordinance, Effect of Amendment, Waiver Policy, Suggested Motion,

Prepared by: Crenna M. Brumwell, Esq. 300 Main Street Suite 330 Dubuque IA 52001 563 589-4381
ORDINANCE NO. ____ 14
AMENDING CITY OF DUBUQUE CODE OF ORDINANCES TITLE 10 PUBLIC WAYS
AND PROPERTY, CHAPTER 4 PARADES AND ASSEMBLIES BY ADDING
SEPARATE SECTIONS FOR GROUPS OF 24 OR LESS PEOPLE AND GROUPS OF
25 OR MORE, CLARIFYING THAT A HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT IS
NECESSARY FOR GROUPS OF OVER 25 PEOPLE, DISTINQUISHING BETWEEN
EVENTS THAT OCCUR ON CITY PROPERTY, PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR
PRIVATE PROPERTY, CLARIFYING WHEN A PERMIT IS NECESSARY FOR
EVENTS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND ADDING A PROVISION WHICH ALLOWS
THE CITY MANAGER TO WAIVE CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS PER AN ADOPTED
POLICY; AND AMENDING TITLE 10 PUBLIC WAYS AND PROPERTY BY ADDING
A NEW CHAPTER 8, VALET DROP OFF PARKING; PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
WHICH MOVES THE VALET PARKING REGULATIONS TO A DIFFERENT
LOCATION WITHIN TITLE 10.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DUBUQUE, IOWA:
Section 1. Title 10, Chapter 4 of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances is
amended to read as follows:
10-4-1: GATHERINGS; PERMIT REQUIREMENTS:
A. Gatherings Of Twenty-Four (24) Or Less People.
1. No permit is required for gatherings of twenty-four (24) or less people.
However, gatherings of twenty-four (24) or less people must comply with all other
applicable City codes.
2. Gatherings of twenty-four (24) or less people may file a courtesy
application with the City Clerk for informational purposes. The information will be
used to facilitate public safety.
B. Gatherings Of Twenty-Five (25) Or More People.
1. Permit Required: Before any group of twenty-five (25) or more persons
collect or gather together upon City property, the public right-of-way, or private
property, they must first obtain a permit from the city manager, which permit must
state the time, manner, and location of such gathering or assembly.
2. Permit Fee: A permit fee and refundable deposit will be collected based
on the size and location of the gathering.
3. Permit Application:
a. Filing Of Application: An application for a permit containing the
information required herein must be filed with the city manager by any
group desiring to use any city property, public right-of-way, or private
property as provided in this section. Applications must be made on forms
prepared by the city manager, and must contain the information required
herein. The city manager must have a reasonable time to grant or deny
the permit. The length of time that is reasonable will be determined by the
location and size of the event, the information supplied, the time of filing of
the application, and the extent of advance preparation or planning
demonstrated and reasonably required.
b. Grant Or Denial Of Permit: The city manager must grant or deny
the permit, in writing, according to the standards set forth in subsection 5
of this section and must provide the written decision to the applicant by
regular mail or by personal delivery.
4. Application Form; Information Required:
a. Contents Of Application: The application form for the use of any city
property, public right-of-way, or private property must contain the following
information:
(1) Name and address of the applicant and the sponsoring
organization, if any.
(2) A description of the event that is planned.
(3) Proposed location or locations.
(4) Expected size of group.
(5) Date, time and expected length of the use.
(6) Names and addresses of the person or persons to be in
charge of the proposed use at the specified location.
(7) Names and addresses of any persons to be featured as
entertainers or speakers.
(8) List of mechanical or electronic equipment to be used.
(9) Number and type of any motor vehicles or other forms of
transportation to be used, including bicycles.
(10) Number and type of any animals to be used.
(11) A description of any sound amplification to be used.
(12) Proposed monitoring of the group, including the number of
people who will set up and clean up.
(13) Plan for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
and Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines
(ADAAG).
(14) Other information as the city manager believes necessary to
ensure public access and safety.
b. Hold Harmless Agreement: For gatherings of more than twenty-five
(25) people on city property or the public right-of-way, the application will
include an agreement pursuant to which the applicant agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold harmless the city and its agents, officers and employees,
from any and all claims, lawsuits, damages, losses and expenses, of
whatever nature, which may result from or arise from the gathering
covered by the permit, irrespective of whether said claims are frivolous or
meritorious.
5. Standards For Issuance: The city manager must examine the application,
and must grant or deny said permit based upon the following standards:
a. Interference With Privacy, Safety And Security: In light of the date
and time of said proposed use, whether the use will unreasonably interfere
with the privacy, safety, security, convenience and tranquility of the
residents or inhabitants of the area.
b. Size And Condition Of Accommodations: Whether the proposed
city property, public right-of-way, or private property can accommodate the
group or use, based both on group size and on health and sanitation
facilities, whether available or to be provided by applicant.
c. Compatibility Of Use: Whether the proposed gathering is
compatible with the normal activity of the city property, public right-of-way,
or private property at the requested time or date.
d. Demonstration Of Means, Planning And Coordination: Whether the
application demonstrates the applicant has the means, planning and
coordination to hold the gathering, considering the time of day, location,
public facilities available, traffic control, parking requirements and any
monitoring required to protect the public health and safety.
e. Timing Of Event: Whether the event will interfere with another event
for which a permit has already been granted.
f. Interruption Of Vehicular Or Pedestrian Traffic: Whether the
proposed use would substantially interrupt the flow of street and/or
pedestrian traffic.
g. Excessive Diversion Of Police: Whether the use would require the
excessive diversion of police from other duties, or substantially interfere
with the city’s firefighting operations.

6. Revocation Of Permit: After a permit is granted, in the event it is
determined that the applicant has misstated any material fact in the application,
or that there is a substantial and material variance between the information in the
application and the actual facts or those facts that appear reasonably to have
occurred, the city manager may review such application and revoke such permit
if not in compliance with this subsection. Such permit may also be revoked when
it is determined by the chief of police that by reason of disaster, public calamity,
riot or other emergency, the public safety requires such revocation.
10-4-2: UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY:
A. Definition: Any “unlawful assembly” is three (3) or more persons assembled
together, with them or any of them acting in a violent manner, and with intent that they
or any of them will commit a public offense or causing other persons to be intimidated,
harassed or placed in fear of bodily harm.
B. Prohibited Act: It is unlawful for a person to willingly join in or remain a part of an
unlawful assembly, knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe that it is such.
C. Refusal To Disperse: It is unlawful for any person within the hearing distance of a
police officer who orders the participants in an unlawful assembly of persons in the
immediate vicinity of an unlawful assembly to refuse to disperse.
D. Lawful Assemblies Excepted: Nothing in this section will be construed to prevent
persons from gathering together in orderly or lawful assemblies and which will not result
in the disturbance of the peace or disorderly conduct.
10-4-3: GATHERINGS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY; PERMIT REQUIREMENTS:
A. Permit Required: For events on private property, a permit stating the time,
manner, and location of such event will be required when the person knows or
reasonably should know that the event will substantially affect public health or safety or
the peace and quiet of a neighborhood by reason of the number of persons attending
such event, the use of outdoor music or amplified noise, and the likely effect on traffic
and parking, and:
1. A fee is charged to attendees; or
2. The property possesses a zoning classification other than R and the event
is outside of the original intent or purpose of the facility.
B. Permit Fee: A permit fee will be collected based on whether the event is open to
the public.
C. Permit Application:
1. Filing Of Application; Contents: An application for a permit containing the
information required herein must be filed with the city manager by a person
holding such an event. Applications must be made on forms prepared by the city
manager, and contain the information required herein. The city manager must
have a reasonable time to grant or deny the permit. The length of time that is
reasonable will be determined by the size of the event, the information supplied,
the time of filing of the application, and the extent of advance preparation or
planning demonstrated and reasonably required.
2. Grant Or Denial Of Permit: The city manager must grant or deny the
permit, in writing, according to the standards set forth in subsection E of this
section and must provide the written decision to the applicant by regular mail or
personal delivery.
D. Application Form; Information Required: The application form for the event must
contain the following information:
1. Name and address of the applicant and the sponsoring organization, if
any.
2. A description of the event that is planned.
3. Proposed location or locations.
4. Expected size of group.
5. Date, time and expected length of use.
6. Names and addresses of the person or persons to be in charge of the
proposed use at the specified location.
7. Names and addresses of any persons to be featured as entertainers or
speakers.
8. List of mechanical or electronic equipment to be used.
9. Number and type of any motor vehicles or other forms of transportation to
be used, including bicycles.
10. Number and type of any animals to be used.
11. A description of any sound amplification to be used.
E. Standards For Issuance: The city manager must examine the application and
grant or deny said permit based upon the following standards:
1. Interference With Privacy, Safety, Security: In light of the date and time of
said proposed use, whether the use will unreasonably interfere with the privacy,
safety, security, convenience and tranquility of the residents or inhabitants of the
area.
2. Compatibility Of Use: Whether the proposed use or activity is compatible
with the normal activity of the neighborhood at the requested time and date.
3. Demonstration Of Means, Planning And Coordination: Whether the
application demonstrates the applicant has the means, planning and coordination
to hold the proposed event, considering the time of day, location, traffic control,
parking requirements and any monitoring required to protect the public health
and safety.
4. Timing Of Event: Whether the event will interfere with another event for
which a permit has already been granted.
5. Interruption Of Vehicular And Pedestrian Traffic: Whether the proposed
use would substantially interrupt the flow of street and/or pedestrian traffic.
6. Excessive Diversion Of Police: Whether the use would require the
excessive diversion of police from other duties or substantially interfere with the
city’s firefighting operations.
F. Revocation Of Permit: After a permit is granted, in the event it is determined that
the applicant has misstated any material fact in the application, or that there is a
substantial and material variance between the information in the application and the
actual facts or those facts that appear reasonably to have occurred, the city manager
may review such application and revoke such permit if not in compliance with this
chapter. Such permit may also be revoked when it is determined by the chief of police
that by reason of disaster, public calamity, riot or other emergency, the public safety
requires such revocation.
10-4-4: WAIVER.
The City Manager is authorized to waive certain requirements based on criteria
approved in the Special Events Permit Waiver Policy.
Section 2. Title 10 of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances is amended by
adding the following chapter:
10-8-1: VALET DROP OFF PARKING; PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
A. Permit Required. Before any for profit organization or business offers valet drop
off parking, the organization or business must first obtain a permit from the city
manager.
B. Permit Fee. A permit fee will be charged at the rate of four hundred dollars
($400.00) per year.
C. Permit Application:
1. Filing of Application. An application for a permit containing the information
required herein must be filed with the city manager by any group desiring to use
any city property or public right-of-way as provided in this section. Applications
must be made on forms prepared by the city manager, and must contain the
information required herein. The city manager must have a reasonable time to
grant or deny the permit. The length of time that is reasonable will be determined
by the location, the information supplied, the time of filing of the application,
public safety, and the extent of advance preparation or planning demonstrated
and reasonably required.
2. Grant or Denial of Permit. The city manager must grant or deny the
permit, in writing, according to the standards set forth in subsection E of this
section and must provide the written decision to the applicant by regular mail or
by personal delivery.
D. Application Form; Information Required.
1. Contents of Application: The application form for the use of any city
property, public right-of-way, or private property must contain the following
information:
a. Name and address of the applicant and the sponsoring
organization, if any.
b. Proposed location or locations.
c. Expected size of group.
d. Date, time and expected length of the use.
e. Names and addresses of the person or persons to be in charge of
the proposed use at the specified location.
f. Names and addresses of any persons to be featured as
entertainers or speakers.
g. List of mechanical or electronic equipment to be used.
h. Number and type of any motor vehicles or other forms of
transportation to be used, including bicycles.
i. Number and type of any animals to be used.
j. A description of any sound amplification to be used.
k. Proposed monitoring of the group, including the number of people
who will set up and clean up.
l. Plan for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG).
m. Other information as the city manager believes necessary to ensure
public access and safety.
2. Hold Harmless Agreement. For valet parking on city property or the public
right-of-way the application must include an agreement pursuant to which the
applicant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the city and its agents,
officers and employees, from any and all claims, lawsuits, damages, losses and
expenses, of whatever nature, which may result from or arise from the provision
of valet parking covered by the permit, irrespective of whether said claims are
frivolous or meritorious.
E. Standards for Issuance. The city manager must examine the application, and
must grant or deny said permit based upon the following standards:
1. Interference with Privacy, Safety and Security: In light of the date and time
of said proposed use, whether the use will unreasonably interfere with the
privacy, safety, security, convenience and tranquility of the residents or
inhabitants of the area.
2. Size and Condition of Accommodations: Whether the proposed city
property or public right-of-way can accommodate the proposed use, based both
on size, location, and public safety.
3. Compatibility of Use: Whether the proposed valet parking is compatible
with the normal activity of the city property or public right-of-way at the requested
time or date.
4. Demonstration of Means, Planning and Coordination: Whether the
application demonstrates the applicant has the means, planning and coordination
to perform the valet parking considering the time of day, location, public or
private facilities available, traffic control, parking requirements and any
monitoring required to protect the public health and safety.
5. Timing of Event: Whether valet parking will interfere with another event or
valet parking operation for which a permit has already been granted.
6. Interruption of Vehicular or Pedestrian Traffic: Whether the proposed use
would substantially interrupt the flow of street and/or pedestrian traffic.
7. Excessive Diversion of Police: Whether the use would require the
excessive diversion of police from other duties, or substantially interfere with the
city’s firefighting operations.
F. Revocation Of Permit: After a permit is granted, in the event it is determined that
the applicant has misstated any material fact in the application, or that there is a
substantial and material variance between the information in the application and the
actual facts or those facts that appear reasonably to have occurred, the city manager
may review such application and revoke such permit if not in compliance with this
chapter. Such permit may also be revoked when it is determined by the chief of police
that by reason of disaster, public calamity, riot or other emergency, the public safety
requires such revocation.
Section 3. This Ordinance takes effect upon publication.
Passed, approved, and adopted the ____ day of _______________, 2014.
Roy D. Buol, Mayor
Attest:
Kevin S. Firnstahl, City Clerk

 

 How many visitors are real?

As I delve into my site I am finding more often then not spam is my only companion. I wish it weren’t so but it is. If anyone is really interested I wish they would respond and let me know.

Military Backlash Against Obama
 
 
A movement has been started by our armed forces, to get out the vote in 2014..
They are organizing themselves, but this can be done by all of us.
 
The President, the Commander in Chief, has made the Rules of Engagement
(ROE) so difficult, that our troops are often killed before they can even get
permission to fight.Nothing has been done to stop our troops from being
murdered by the Afghanis they are training, either.
 
Now, the President wants the US to sign on to the UNs International Criminal
Court (ICC),which would allow the UNs ICC to arrest and try US troops for War
Crimes, without the legalprotections guaranteed under US Law, and from which
there is no appeal.
 
The President, with his Democratic control of the Senate, has nearly all the power.
If the non-establishment can take back the Senate in 2014, our troops can once again
be protected from unnecessary danger.
 
Please consider this, and send it on to your mailing lists. Thank You and Semper Fi.
Interestingly enough, when GWB was president you heard about the the military
deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan almost daily.  With Obama in the White House, the
mainstream media has been strangely quiet.
 
More than 1,000 American soldiers have lost their lives in Afghanistan in the last 27 months.
This is more than the combined total of the nine years before. Thirty have died in August.
During the last month, over 50 additional NATO and US servicemen have been murdered, inside
jobs by those who are hired to be a force for good in Afghanistan.
 
The commander in chief is AWOL.  Not a peep, although he ordered the White House
flag flown at half-staff for the Sikhs that were killed. There is a deep disgust, a fury, growing
in the ranks of the military against the indifferent and total incompetence of this president.
 
It has taken on a dangerous tone.  No one knows what to do about him, but the anger runs deep
as the deaths continue with no strategic end in sight to the idiocy of this war.  Obama has had 4
years to end this futile insanity, during which time he has vacationed, golfed, campaigned, and
generally ignored the plight of our men and women in uniform {and so much more}.
But, there is now a movement afoot in the armed services to launch a massive get out the vote
drive against this president.  Not just current active duty types, but the National Guard, Reserves,
the retired, and all other prior service members. This is no small special interest group, but many
millions of veterans who can have an enormous impact on the outcome of the November election
if they all respond.
 
The million military retirees in Florida alone could mean an overwhelming victory in that state if
they all show up at the polls. It might not keep another one hundred U.S. troops from dying
between now and November, but a turn out to vote by the military against this heart breaking
lack of leadership can make a powerful statement that hastens a change to the indifference of
this shallow little man who just lets our soldiers die.
This doesn’t mention the purging of the military leadership that does not worship Obama.
 
Veterans:  Please do forward this to your fellow veterans & friends.

 

 

Don’t just delete this!! It is VERY IMPORTANT.

 

Do you have a gun in your House? When I had my gangrene gallbladder taken out and spent 10 days in the hospital for what should have been an overnight stay the insurance company kicked me out. I had home nurse visits for two weeks and was asked if I had guns in the house. I respond that if I did I would not tell them. So the below has some merit. FYI, I am passing this along…there are comments from two other people that have also been asked if they keep guns in the house. The nurse just kind of slipped it in along with all the other regular questions. I told herI refused to answer because it was against the law to ask.

Everyone, whether you have guns or not, should give a neutral answer so they have no idea who does and who doesn’t. My doctor asked me if I had guns in my house and also if any were loaded. I, of course, answered yes to both questions. Then he asked why I kept a loaded gun close to my bed. I answered that my son, who is a certified gun instructor and also works for Homeland Security, advised me that an unloaded, locked up gun is no protection against criminal attack. The Government now requires these questions be asked of people on Medicare, and probably everyone else. Just passing this along for your information: I had to visit a doctor other than my regular doctor when my doctor was on vacation. One of the questions on the form I had to fill out was: Do you have any guns in your house? My answer was None of your business!!So it is out there! It is either an insurance issue or government intervention.

Either way, it is out there and the second the government gets into your medical records (as they want to under Obamacare) it will become a major issue and will ultimately result in lock and load!!

Please pass this on to all the other retired guys and gun owners…Thanks, from a Vietnam Vet and retired Police Officer: I had a doctors appointment at the local VA clinic yesterday and found out something very interesting that I would like to pass along. While going through triage before seeing the doctor, I was asked at the end of the exam, three questions: 1. Did I feel stressed? 2. Did I feel threatened? 3. Did I feel like doing harm to someone? The nurse then informed me, that if I had answered yes to any of the questions, I would have lost my concealed carry permit as it would have gone into my medical records and the VA would have reported it to Homeland Security. Looks like they are going after the vets first. Other gun people like retired law enforcement will probably be next. Then when they go after the civilians, what argument will they have? Be forewarned and be aware. The Obama administration has gone on record as considering veterans and gun owners potential terrorists. Whether you are a gun owner, veteran or not, YOU”VE BEEN WARNED ! If you know veterans and gun owners, please pass this on to them. Be very cautious about what you say and to whom!!

 

For God’s sake America wake up!!

Subject: : Senators – 53-46 vote
The U.N. Resolution 2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps of most interest is point number 11: “CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION, DISARMAMENT —”
HOORAY – 53-46 vote – The U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution.
At least our Texas Senators are not on this list.  I am sorry to see so many other states have a sorry record of the 2nd amendment support.
This is that brief, glorious moment in history
when everyone stands around…reloading.
Now, Which 46 Senators Voted to Destroy Us? Well, let their names become known !! See below . If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46 “legis..traitors”… vote against them.
In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.  The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads:  “To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.”  The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms.  The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented aninternational gun registry, now get this,on all private guns and ammo.
Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power.
Here are the 46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.
Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Durbin (D-IL)j
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)
Folks: This needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns. They need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed.
46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.

A Must Read

 
For the SHOCK of your life, take 1 minute to comprehend what you read below. During our lifetimes, all Presidents have issued Executive Orders. For various reasons, some have issued more than others. These things will directly affect us all, in years to come. Question is: Do YOU care enough to send this, ‘shocking info,’ to people you love?
 
Ike – 2 in 8 years
Kennedy – 4 in 3 years
LBJ – 4 in 5 years
Nixon – 1 in 6 years
Ford – 3 in 2 years
Carter – 3 in 4 years
Reagan – 5 in 8 years
Bush – 3 in 4 years
Clinton – 15 in 8 years
George W. Bush – 62 in 8 years
Obama – 923 in 3 1/2 years! More than 1000+ and counting Executive Orders in 6 years… 
Read some of them below – unbelievable! 
Next step -dictatorship. (Looks like we are there already!)If you don’t get the implications, you’re not paying attention. How come all the other presidents in the past 100 years have not felt it necessary to INCREASE GOVERNMENT’S POWER OVER THE PEOPLE with more than 1,000 Executive Orders? This is really very scary. And most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening.
 
YES, THERE IS A REASON THAT THIS PRESIDENT IS DETERMINED TO TAKE CONTROL AWAY FROM THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE.
Even some Democrats in the House have turned on him, plus a very small number of Democrat Senators have questioned him. Rightfully so. - 
WHAT IS OBAMA REALLY TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH????
Remember what he told Russia’s Putin: “I’ll be more flexible after I’m re-elected”.
 
Now look at these:
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 — allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 — allows the government to seize and control the communication media. 
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 — allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 — allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 — allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 — allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 — designates the registration of all persons. Postmaster General to operate a national registration.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 — allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 — allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations. 
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 — allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 — assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 — specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 — grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 — allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. Financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.
Feel free to verify the “executive orders” at will…..and these are just the major ones. I’m sure you’ve all heard the tale of the “Frog in the Pot”… Watch Obama’s actions, not his words! By his actions he will show you where America is headed.
 
Obama has issued executive orders that seek to “harmonize” U.S. Economic regulations with the rest of the world. These executive orders are yet another incremental step that is pushing us closer to a North American Union and a one world economic system.
Obama used the stage at the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s I have a dream speech to announce two new executive orders infringing on your second amendment rights.. The first bans the importation of antique military firearms for sale to sportsman and collectors.. He intentionally mislabels them military grade weapons to deceive the sheeple, but make no mistake . . . the order was written specifically to ban the importation of surplus M1 carbines, M1 Garands, 1903 Springfields and other antiques coveted by collectors and sport shooters. This order is the death knell for the civilian marksmanship program. Congress had previously passed the sportsman protection act in 1986 which among other things guaranteed that the importation of the historic relics for collectors and the CMP would not be impeded by unreasonable regulations..But Emperor Obama does not bend to the will of the people or the rule of law.. He will impose on his subjects what he wishes, when he wishes. Kind of like Papa Joe Stalin or the short Austrian with the funky mustache!Unfortunately, most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening.The American people need to understand that Barack Obama is constantly looking for ways to integrate the United States more deeply with the rest of the world.
The globalization of the world economy has accelerated under Obama, and this latest executive order represents a fundamental change in U.S. economic policy. Now federal regulators will be required to “harmonize” their work with the international community.
 
If THIS IS DIFFICULT TO BELIEVE, THEN PROVE TO YOURSELF IT’S WRONG – Google it!
http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/executive-orders

Leave a Reply